SEBRING ASSOCIATES v. COYLE


790 A.2d 225 (2002)

347 N.J. Super. 414

SEBRING ASSOCIATES, a New Jersey Partnership; James N. Canino; and Anthony R. Palmeri, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Eugene J. COYLE, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 6, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony P. Ambrosio, Bloomfield, argued the cause for appellant, (Ambrosio, Kyreakakis, Dilorenzo, Moraff & McKenna, attorneys; Mr. Ambrosio, of counsel and on the brief; Andrew J. Kyreakakis, on the brief).

Theodore L. Abeles argued the cause for respondents, (Tompkins, McGuire, Wachenfeld & Barry, Newark, attorneys; Mr. Abeles, of counsel and on the brief; Brian M. English, on the brief).

Before Judges BAIME, FALL and AXELRAD.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BAIME, P.J.A.D.

The principal question presented by this appeal is whether a partner's refusal to contribute necessary capital to the partnership constitutes misconduct sufficient to warrant judicial dissolution. Following a twenty-eight day trial, the Chancery Division judge issued an extensive written opinion in which she found that defendant Eugene Coyle's failure to contribute funds necessary to the survival of Sebring...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases