1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 57 P.3d
  5. 57 P.3d 944 (2002)
 

STATE v. POTTER

Z911727; A115242.

57 P.3d 944 (2002)

185 Or.App. 81

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. David F. POTTER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 13, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew S. Chilton argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Julie A. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and KISTLER and SCHUMAN, Judges.

KISTLER, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for impeding traffic and failing to use a bicycle lane. He contends that a bicyclist cannot be convicted of impeding traffic and that there was no evidence that the city had determined that the bicycle lane was suitable for safe bicycle use, as required by statute. We affirm.

Defendant participated in a Critical Mass bicycle ride. He was one of several bicyclists

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases