1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 124 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 124 Cal.Rptr.2d 877 (2002)
 

ROULIER v. CANNONDALE

No. B145607.

124 Cal.Rptr.2d 877 (2002)

101 Cal.App.4th 1180

Jean Daniel ROULIER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CANNONDALE et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

Review Denied December 18, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Berglund, Johnson & Sommer and Daniel W. Johnson, Woodland Hills, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Haight, Brown & Bonesteel, Jules S. Zeman, Los Angeles, and Kevin M. Osterberg, Riverside, for Defendants and Respondents.

EPSTEIN, J.

Jean Daniel Roulier appeals from a judgment of dismissal based on forum non conveniens. He contends that Switzerland is not a suitable alternative forum, and that the balance of private and public interest factors weighs in favor of retaining jurisdiction in California. While we agree with the trial court that Switzerland is a suitable forum, in the context of the unusual procedural history of this case, we also conclude the trial court did not abuse its...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases