IN RE ESTATE OF ROCCAMONTE


787 A.2d 198 (2001)

346 N.J. Super. 107

In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Arthur J. ROCCAMONTE, Sr. Mary Sopko, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Estate of Arthur J. Roccamonte, Sr. Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 28, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. Breslin, Jr., Hackensack and John M. Breslin, Paramus, attorneys for appellant (Michael J. Breslin, Jr., of counsel and, with Diana Ferriero, on the brief).

Joel C. Seltzer, Union, attorney for respondent.

Before Judges KESTIN, STEINBERG and ALLEY.


The opinion of the court was delivered by KESTIN, J.A.D.

In a prior opinion in this matter, In re Estate of Roccamonte, 324 N.J.Super. 357, 735 A.2d 614 (App.Div.1999) (Roccamonte I), we determined that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to the Estate of Arthur A. Roccamonte (defendant) and dismissing Mary Sopko's (plaintiff's) contract-based cause of action for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases