1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 25 P.3d
  5. 25 P.3d 958 (2001)
 

IN RE CONDUCT OF HARTMAN

(OSB 94-219A; SC S45712 (Control)), (OSB 94-219B; SC S45713).

25 P.3d 958 (2001)

332 Or. 241

In re Complaint as to the CONDUCT OF Gregory A. HARTMAN. In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Elizabeth Ann McKanna.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided June 14, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas M. Christ, Special Counsel, Oregon State Bar, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for the Oregon State Bar.

David Markowitz, of Markowitz, Herbold, Glade & Mehlhaf, P.C., Portland, argued the cause for the accused. With him on the brief was Lynn R. Stafford, Portland.

Before CARSON, Chief Justice, and GILLETTE, KULONGOSKI, and LEESON, Justices.

PER CURIAM

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, a majority of a trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found that the accused lawyers, Gregory A. Hartman and Elizabeth Ann McKanna (collectively, "the accused"), did not violate Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(3) (prohibiting conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation); DR 2-110(B)(2) (requiring withdrawal from employment if lawyer knows, or it is obvious...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases