1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 105 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 105 Cal.Rptr.2d 872 (2001)
 

MOTION PICTURE & TEL. FUND v. SUPERIOR CT.

No. B147436.

105 Cal.Rptr.2d 872 (2001)

88 Cal.App.4th 488

MOTION PICTURE AND TELEVISION FUND HOSPITAL, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent, Rose Marie Lopez et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

April 12, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ballard, Rosenberg, Golper & Savitt, Linda Miller Savitt, Christine T. Hoeffner, Sherman Oaks, and Adrian J. Guidotti, for Petitioner.

Frederick R. Bennett, Los Angeles, for Respondent.

Shegerian & Associates and Carney R. Shegerian, for Real Parties in Interest.

BY THE COURT:*

The question before this court is the commencement of the statutory time period for filing a peremptory challenge to a newly assigned direct calendar judge. (Code Civ. Proc, § 170.6.)1 We hold the time commences when the parties receive notice of the assignment.

In this proceeding, defendant Motion Picture and Television Fund Hospital (defendant) petitions for issuance of a writ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases