POORE v. POORE

No. CA 01-510.

61 S.W.3d 912 (2001)

76 Ark.App. 99

Wayne Curtis POORE v. Diann POORE.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division I.

December 5, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bullock & Van Kleef, by John D. Van Kleef, Russellville, for appellant.

Peel Law Firm, P.A., by Jennifer L. Modersohn, Russellville, for appellee.


JOHN E. JENNINGS, Judge.

Wayne Curtis Poore appeals from the dismissal of his complaint for divorce in which he sought to end his two-year marriage to appellee, Diann Poore. For reversal, he contends that the chancellor erred in granting her motion for a directed verdict, finding that he had failed to establish grounds for a divorce, and that the chancellor erred in denying his motion for a new trial. We find no error and affirm.

In October 2000, appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases