1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 252 F.3d
  5. 252 F.3d 721 (2001)
 

CARRABBA v. RANDALLS FOOD MARKETS, INC.

No. 00-10520.

252 F.3d 721 (2001)

Joe CARRABBA, Jr., Individually & on behalf of all others similarly situated; Joe Melton, Individually & on behalf of all others similarly situated; Craig McKnight, Individually & on behalf of all others similarly situated; Robert H. Burrows, Jr., Individually & on behalf of all others similarly situated; Barbara A. Williams, Individually & on behalf of all others similarly situated; Loyd Wellesley, Individually & on behalf of all others similarly situated; Willard P. Correll, Sr., Individually & on behalf of all others similarly situated; Bruce Philpot, Individually & on behalf of all others similarly situated; J. Bruce Gray, Individually & on behalf of all others similarly situated; Rick Williams, Individually & on behalf of all others similarly situated; A. Joe Cutrer, Individually & on behalf of all others similarly situated; Roberto G. Fernandez Vinas, Individually & on behalf of all others similarly situated; Thomas D. McCarthy; Wylie Holmes; Dave Cooper; Ed Fortner; Jack D. Neal; Floyd E. Fulcher; Jack W. Sprabary; Robert L. Stockton; Carroll E. Brown; Michael J. Hammer; Scott E. Peterson; William H. Mansfield, Jr.; James S. Standifer; Bettie J. Garrett; Cherie J. Stowe; Arvil R. Martin, Jr.; Sanford W. Maynard; Denise P. Miller; Everett G. Grosgebauer; Gregory E. Smith; Michael Chessmore; Ima Dell Irvin, Individually & on behalf of all others similar situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, v. RANDALLS FOOD MARKETS, INC., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 22, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Lee Wright (argued), William G. Whitehill, Elaine A. Murphy, Gardere & Wynne, Dallas, TX, Thomas F. Dunn, Dunn & Roark, Arlington, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.

David T. Harvin (argued), Wallis M. Hampton, Vinson & Elkins, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.

Before JONES, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The court has carefully considered this appeal in light of the excellent briefs, oral arguments, and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we find no reversible error of fact or law by the district court and affirm based on that court's conscientious, well-reasoned opinions, which will be published.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases