EPSTEIN v. BID II

No. B134256.

104 Cal.Rptr.2d 857 (2001)

87 Cal.App.4th 862

Aaron EPSTEIN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HOLLYWOOD ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT II BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

Review Denied June 13, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Moskowitz, Brestoff, Winston & Blinderman, Dennis A. Winston and Barbara S. Blinderman, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, Costa Mesa, and Andre J. Cronthall, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Respondents Hollywood Entertainment District II Business Improvement District and Hollywood Entertainment District Property Owners Association.

James K. Hahn, City Attorney, Patricia V. Tubert, Senior Assistant City Attorney and Kenneth Cirlin, Assistant City Attorney for Defendant and Respondent City of Los Angeles.


CROSKEY, J.

The Hollywood Entertainment District II Business Improvement District (BID II) is a special assessment district in the City of Los Angeles (City). The Hollywood Entertainment District Property Owners Association (the POA), a 26 United States Code section 501(c)(6) non-profit corporation, administers the funds City raises through assessments on businesses within BID IPs boundaries.1 The money is used to contract for such things...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases