1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 265 F.3d
  5. 265 F.3d 692 (2001)
 

SWEAT v. CITY OF FORT SMITH, ARKANSAS

No. 00-2403.

265 F.3d 692 (2001)

Donald SWEAT, Rev.; Albert Krantz; Ron Decker, Appellants, v. CITY OF FORT SMITH, ARKANSAS; City of Van Buren, Arkansas; City of Alma, Arkansas, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Filed: September 11, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David B. Goldstein, argued, New York, NY (Eric M. Lieberman, on the brief), for appellants.

Jeanette Denham, argued, North Little Rock, AR, for appellee City of Alma.

Jerry L. Canfield, argued, Fort Smith, AR, for appellee City of Fort Smith.

Before HANSEN and HEANEY, Circuit Judges, and BATTEY, District Judge.

HANSEN, Circuit Judge.

This case arose out of a constitutional challenge to certain ordinances enacted by the defendant municipalities. This is the second time this case has been before our court. In the first appeal, we determined that the challenged ordinances were unconstitutionally overbroad. See Krantz v. City of Fort Smith, 160 F.3d 1214, 1222 (8th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1037, 119 S.Ct. 2397, 2398, 144...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases