Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court correctly determined that the appellant's insured met all of the prerequisites to make a claim against the appellant for underinsured motorist benefits. The insured was excused from his failure to obtain the appellant's consent to his settlement of his action against the parties who injured him because the release he executed sufficiently preserved the appellant's subrogation rights (see, Weinberg...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
