¶ 1 The question we answer in this case is: did the trial judge err in granting summary judgment to appellee, Robert Bartlett (Robert) in a suit brought against him by appellants, Sonya and Richard Cranford? We hold the trial judge erred and the Court of Civil Appeals (COCA) mistakenly affirmed. Summary judgment is reversed and the matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
CRANFORD v. BARTLETT
No. 93,002.
25 P.3d 918 (2001)
2001 OK 47
Sonya CRANFORD and Richard Cranford, Plaintiffs/Appellants/Counter-Appellees, v. Robert BARTLETT, Defendant/Appellee/Counter-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 5, 2001.
June 5, 2001.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Donald R. Bradford, Tulsa, Oklahoma for Appellants/Counter-Appellees.
James R. Hicks of Morrel, West, Saffa, Craige & Hicks, Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma for Appellee/Counter-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
