SCHLIEMAN v. GANNETT MN BROADCASTING, INC.

No. C0-01-935.

637 N.W.2d 297 (2001)

Thomas SCHLIEMAN, Appellant, v. GANNETT MINNESOTA BROADCASTING, INC., n/k/a Multimedia Cablevision, Inc., d/b/a Kare TV, et al., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 26, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick T. Tierney, Collins, Buckley, Sauntry & Haugh, P.L.L.P., St. Paul, for appellant.

Thomas Tinkham and Amy Katz Rotenberg, Dorsey & Whitney L.L.P., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by LANSING, Presiding Judge, KALITOWSKI, Judge, and HANSON, Judge.


OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

In this defamation action against KARE TV, St. Cloud Police Officer Thomas Schlieman challenges the district court's instructions on the elements of defamation. Schlieman alternatively contends that the three statements at issue are defamatory as a matter of law. By notice of review, KARE TV contends that the district court erred in holding that the three statements are capable of supporting a cause of action for defamation. We affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases