1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 786 A.2d
  5. 786 A.2d 143 (2001)
 

MULLER v. EXXON RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO.

786 A.2d 143 (2001)

345 N.J. Super. 595

Arthur MULLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 17, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neil H. Deutsch, Hackensack, argued the cause for appellant (Deutsch, Resnick, Green & Grabell, attorneys; Mr. Deutsch and Jonathan Nirenberg, on the brief).

Lawrence R. Maddock argued the cause for respondent (Waters, McPherson, McNeill, attorneys; Mr. Maddock, on the brief).

Before Judges BAIME, NEWMAN and AXELRAD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by NEWMAN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff, Arthur Muller, appeals from an order granting summary judgment and dismissing plaintiff's complaint alleging a violation of this State's Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 et seq. We affirm.

Plaintiff, who is now fifty-six years old, worked for defendant Exxon Research and Engineering Company (Exxon) from 1978 through 1997. Plaintiff started as a construction mechanic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases