1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 41 S.W.3d
  5. 41 S.W.3d 885 (2001)
 

BECKER GLOVE INTERN. v. JACK DUBINSKY & SONS

No. SC 83294.

41 S.W.3d 885 (2001)

BECKER GLOVE INTERNATIONAL, INC., Respondent, v. JACK DUBINSKY & SONS, et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

April 24, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sanford J. Boxerman, Luke J. Mangan, Clayton, for appellants.

Daniel V. Conlisk, Gerald P. Greiman, Craig A. Wilson, Amany Ragab Hacking, St. Louis, for respondent.

WOLFF, Judge.

The sole question presented by this case is whether the compulsory counterclaim rule found in Rule 55.32(a)1 applies to an action filed in an associate circuit division under chapter 517.2

We hold that the compulsory counterclaim rule does not apply to such actions. For this reason, the trial court's judgment is affirmed.

Background

Becker Glove International...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases