Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff's contention that the limitations period was extended pursuant to General Obligations Law §§ 17-101 and 17-105 is without merit. The letters relied upon by the plaintiff contained a settlement offer conditioned on the plaintiff's acceptance of a disputed reduction in the principal amount of the mortgage—a condition which was never accepted by the plaintiff. The letters did not constitute...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.