Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his argument that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction of robbery in the first degree because the prosecution did not prove ownership of the stolen property (see, Penal Law § 160.15 [3]; see also, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.