Jane DOE and Joan Roe, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.
Court of Appeals of Michigan.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted May 24, 2001, at Lansing.
Decided December 28, 2001, at 9:00 a.m.
Released for Publication March 19, 2002.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Deborah LaBelle and Jeffrey Dillman, Ann Arbor, for the plaintiffs.
Jennifer M. Granholm, Attorney General, Thomas L. Casey, Solicitor General, and Mark Matus, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
Mark A. Cody, Lansing, for Michigan Protection and Advocacy Services, Inc., Michael Steinberg and Mary Moss, Detroit, for American Civil Liberties Union Fund of Michigan, Sandra Girard and Maia Justine Storm, Jackson, for Prison Legal Services of Michigan, Inc., Amici Curiae.
Before: HOEKSTRA, P.J., and DOCTOROFF, MURPHY, MARKEY, SMOLENSKI, WHITBECK, and TALBOT, JJ.
Court of Appeals of Michigan.
ON REMAND
PER CURIAM.
In our previous opinion,2 the majority of a special panel of this Court resolved the conflict between Neal v Dep't of Corrections (On Rehearing) Neal II3 and Doe v. Dep't of Corrections4 by holding that the reasoning in Neal II was consistent with established rules of statutory construction. Defendant Michigan Department of Corrections...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
