BELL v. GAP, INC.


189 Misc.2d 719 (2001)

735 N.Y.S.2d 708

PAMELA BELL, Appellant, v. GAP, INC., Doing Business as GAP Kids, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

August 8, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harriette N. Boxer, New York City, for appellant.

McAndrew Conboy & Prisco, Woodbury (Thomas McCarthy of counsel), for respondent.

McCOOE, J. P., GANGEL-JACOB and SUAREZ, JJ., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Judgment entered September 18, 2000 affirmed, with $25 costs.

Plaintiff consented to the trial court's charge of General Business Law § 218 as a defense to this false arrest action, and has therefore failed to preserve her present appellate argument that the statute was inapplicable to the store incident in question (CPLR 4110-b). Moreover, section 218 provides a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases