1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 623 N.W.2d
  5. 623 N.W.2d 281 (2001)
 

HANNAN v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS

No. C6-00-1335.

623 N.W.2d 281 (2001)

Wilbur HANNAN, Relator, v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 20, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald I. Meshbesher, Jonathan M. Peck, Meshbesher & Spence, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN, for relator.

Jay M. Heffern, Minneapolis City Attorney, Peter W. Ginder, Assistant City Attorney, Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.

Considered and decided by CRIPPEN, Presiding Judge, HARTEN, Judge, and HANSON, Judge.

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Because relator has not identified conflicts between state and local law on the control and destruction of dangerous animals, we affirm an order of destruction issued by the City of Minneapolis. We also find no merit in relator's arguments that state law preempts the municipal ordinance or that city proceedings occurred in this case without due process.

FACTS

In June 2000, the City of Minneapolis Animal Control Division...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases