CINCINNATI INS. CO. v. FRANCK

No. C0-00-1069.

621 N.W.2d 270 (2001)

CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Francine FRANCK and Donald Franck, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

January 2, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter C. Sandberg, Dunlap & Seeger, P.A., Rochester, MN, for appellant.

Paul R. Dahlberg, Meshbesher & Spence, Ltd., Rochester, MN, for respondents.

Considered and decided by LANSING, Presiding Judge, PETERSON and STONEBURNER, Judges.


OPINION

LANSING, Judge

The core issue in this litigation is whether an umbrella-liability insurer has a duty to defend and indemnify its insured when the insured, the primary insurer, and the injured party settle the primary coverage for less than the policy limits. The district court ordered summary judgment against the umbrella insurer, declaring that it was obligated to provide excess coverage for the injured person's claims that exceeded the primary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases