1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 263 F.3d
  5. 263 F.3d 627 (2001)
 

BUCKEYE COMMUNITY HOPE v. CITY OF CUYAHOGA FALLS

Nos. 99-4555, 00-3052.

263 F.3d 627 (2001)

BUCKEYE COMMUNITY HOPE FOUNDATION, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. CITY OF CUYAHOGA FALLS, et al., Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: August 31, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Edward G. Kramer, KRAMER & ASSOCIATES, Cleveland, Ohio, for Cross-Appellants. Virgil E. Arrington, LAW DIRECTOR, CITY OF CUYAHOGA FALLS, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, for Cross-Appellees.

ON BRIEF: Edward G. Kramer, KRAMER & ASSOCIATES, Cleveland, Ohio, Diane E. Citrino, FAIR HOUSING LAW CLINIC, Cleveland, Ohio, for Cross-Appellants.

Virgil E. Arrington, LAW DIRECTOR, CITY OF CUYAHOGA FALLS, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, for Appellees.

Before: JONES, DAUGHTREY, and COLE, Circuit Judges.

Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206

OPINION

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.

This case involves a federal civil rights suit brought by Plaintiffs-Appellants, Buckeye Community Hope Foundation, et al., against the Defendants-Appellees, the City of Cuyahoga Falls ("City"), et al., alleging that the City's decision to allow a referendum to stay the effectiveness of Appellants' lawfully approved site plan violated their constitutional and statutory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases