MORMON v. ACURA OF VAL STREAM


190 Misc.2d 697 (2001)

740 N.Y.S.2d 548

CHERYL MORMON, Respondent, v. ACURA OF VALLEY STREAM, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

December 6, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Long, Tuminello, Besso, Seligman, Quinlan & Werner, Bay Shore (Kevin R. Johnston of counsel), for appellant.

Cheryl Mormon, respondent pro se.

FLOYD, P.J., DOYLE and WINICK, JJ., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

Judgment unanimously reversed without costs and action dismissed without prejudice to renewal in the appropriate forum.

Plaintiff's action, instituted in the Small Claims Part of the District Court, which seeks to recover money damages, in essence also seeks reformation of a contract based on mistake and/or fraud (see generally, Chimart Assoc. v Paul,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases