Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is granted, with costs to abide the event.
Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court erred in the manner in which it permitted the plaintiff's orthopedist to testify concerning the plaintiff's quantified restrictions in the range of motion of the lumbar and cervical portions of his spine. Since the testimony was crucial in determining whether the plaintiff had sustained a serious injury...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.