United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
August 15, 2001.
August 15, 2001.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
James D. Baskin, III, Baskin, Bennett & Komkov L.L.P., Austin, TX, Steven G. Schulman, Samuel H. Rudman, Richard Weiss, Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, New York City, for Peter Wilson.
James D. Baskin, III, Baskin, Bennett & Komkov L.L.P., Austin, TX, Andrew L. Barroway, Marc A. Topaz, Stuart L. Berman, Shiffrin & Barroway, Bal Cynwyd, PA, Steven G. Schulman, Samuel H. Rudman, Richard Weiss, Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, New York City, for HLM Management Co., Donald Douglas, Sr.
Thomas E. Bilek, Hoeffner, Bilek & Eidman, L.L.P., Houston, TX, Fred Taylor Isquith, Gregory Mark Nespole, Wolf, Haldenstein, Adler, Freeman & Herz L.L.P., New York City, Charles J. Piven, Law Offices of Charles J. Piven, P.A., Baltimore, MD, for John Stassi.
James D. Baskin, III, Baskin, Bennett & Komkov L.L.P., Austin, TX, Stuart L. Berman, Shiffrin & Barroway, Bal Cynwyd, PA, for John P. Palen, Carilyn Palen.
Thomas E. Bilek, Hoeffner, Bilek & Eidman, L.L.P., Houston, TX, for Robert Aberger.
James D. Baskin, III, Baskin, Bennett & Komkov L.L.P., Austin, TX, Leo W. Desmond, Law Office of Leo W. Desmond, West Palm Beach, FL, for Tom Sullivan, Joseph G. Mason.
Patton G. Lochridge, McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, Austin, TX, Gregory L. Watts, Michael David Celio, Leo P. Cunningham, Stuart Kagen, Bruce G. Vanyo, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, Palo Alto, CA, for NetSolve, Inc., Craig Tysdal, Harry S. Budow, Kenneth C. Kiely, Robert C. Pojman.
United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division.
ORDER
SPARKS, District Judge.
BE IT REMEMBERED that on the 15th day of August 2001 the Court reviewed the file in the above-styled cause and specifically NetSolve, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss [# 20], the plaintiffs' opposition thereto [# 21] and NetSolve's reply thereto [# 24]; and the Individual Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [# 19], the plaintiffs' opposition thereto [# 22] and the individual defendants' reply thereto [# 23]. After considering the motions...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
