HAASE v. GLAZNER

No. 00-1076.

62 S.W.3d 795 (2001)

R.E. HAASE and PRH Investments, Inc., Petitioners, v. Joseph K. GLAZNER, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Decided November 29, 2001.

Rehearing Overruled January 17, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bradley R. Echols, Gary Shaver, Boon, Shaver, Echols & Coleman, Longview, for Petitioner.

Kenneth L. Ross, Ross Hudgens & Associates, Longview, John R. Mercy Carter & Elliott, Texarkana, for Respondents.


Justice ENOCH delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case requires us to decide whether a party can maintain a claim based on either fraud or fraudulent inducement when that claim is premised on a contract that the Statute of Frauds makes unenforceable. We hold that a plaintiff cannot assert a fraudulent inducement claim in the absence of a contract. We further hold that under the facts of this case, to the extent that Glazner seeks to recover the benefit-of-the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases