Jose A. BAZAN-REYES, Wincenty Z. Maciasowicz, and Arnoldo Gomez-Vela, Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE and John D. Ashcroft, Respondents-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued November 9, 2000.
Decided July 5, 2001.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Michael Morrone (argued), Bloomington, IN, for Petitioner Jose A. Bazan-Reyes in No. 99-3861.
Janet Reno, U.S. Atty. Gen., Office of the U.S. Atty. Gen., Washington, DC, Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, INS, Chicago, IL, James A. Hunolt, Susan Houser (argued), Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent INS in No. 99-3861.
James A. Hunolt, John D. Ashcroft, Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondents Janet Reno and John D. Ashcroft in No. 99-3861.
Y. Judd Azulay, Stanley J. Horn (argued), Azulay, Horn, Kalaf & Yoo, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner Wincenty Maciasowicz in No. 99-3917.
Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, INS, Chicago, IL, William E. Michaels, Susan Houser (argued), Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent INS in No. 99-3917.
Royal F. Berg (argued), Chicago, IL, for Petitioner Arnoldo Gomez-Vela in No. 99-3922.
Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, INS, Chicago, IL, Robert L. Bombaugh, Susan Houser (argued), Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent INS in No. 99-3922.
Michael E. Gordon, Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., Immigration Litigation, John D. Ashcroft, Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondents Janet Reno and John D. Ashcroft in No. 99-3922.
Before FLAUM, Chief Judge, and RIPPLE and KANNE, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
Petitioners Jose A. Bazan-Reyes, Wincenty Z. Maciasowicz, and Arnoldo Gomez-Vela seek review of decisions by the Immigration and Naturalization Service ("INS") and the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") finding them removable as a result of state drunk driving offenses. These cases were consolidated for the purposes of appeal because they all raise the same issue: are petitioners' state drunk driving convictions aggravated felonies as defined...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
