1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 108 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 108 Cal.Rptr.2d 748 (2001)
 

LUND v. SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY RAILROAD

No. F034334.

108 Cal.Rptr.2d 748 (2001)

90 Cal.App.4th 247

Ronald G. LUND, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY RAILROAD, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

Review Granted September 26, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dowling, Aaron & Keeler, William T. McLaughlin II, Timothy R. Sullivan, Fresno; Lane Powell, Spears Lubersky and Michael B. King for Defendant and Appellant.

Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May, Los Angeles, Joseph P. Mascovich, Oakland; Brasher Law Firm and William A. Brasher, for The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company as Amici Curiae, on behalf of Defendant and Appellant.

Miller & Reivitis, Kimberly A. Miller, Michael E. Reivitis; and Charlotte E. Costan, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Certified for Partial Publication.*

OPINION

VARTABEDIAN, J.

This is an appeal by defendant San Joaquin Valley Railroad (appellant) from a judgment against it in a worker's suit for personal injury under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 United States Code section 51 et seq. (FELA). In the unpublished portion of this opinion, we discuss appellant's contentions that plaintiff Ronald G. Lund (respondent) obtained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases