1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 784 A.2d
  5. 784 A.2d 64 (2001)
 

NEW JERSEY DEPT. OF LABOR v. PEPSI-COLA CO.

784 A.2d 64 (2001)

170 N.J. 59

NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Petitioner-Respondent, and Teamsters Local 125 and 185 Individual Claimants, Intervenors-Respondents, v. PEPSI-COLA COMPANY, Respondent-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 14, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wayne J. Positan, Roseland, argued the cause for appellant (Lum, Danzis, Drasco, Positan & Kleinberg, attorneys; Mr. Positan and Richard A. West, Jr., on the briefs).

Karen A. Du Mars, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent New Jersey Department of Labor (John J. Farmer, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Nancy Kaplen, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

James L. Linsey, New York City, argued the cause for respondents Teamsters Local 125 and 185 Individual Claimants (Cohen, Weiss and Simon, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division allowing the Commissioner of Labor to award prejudgment interest against Pepsi-Cola Company in order to make whole the claimants who were underpaid for overtime hours worked. We do so substantially for the reasons stated in the thorough and thoughtful opinion of Judge King. New Jersey Dep't of Labor v. Pepsi-Cola, 336 N.J.Super. 532, 765 A...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases