1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 786 So.2d
  5. 786 So.2d 61 (2001)
 

KATES v. ROBINSON

No. 4D00-1093.

786 So.2d 61 (2001)

George KATES and Nehama Kates, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. James D. ROBINSON and Spence, Payne, Masington & Needle, P.A., Appellees/Cross-Appellants, and Scott Jay, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 16, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Warren R. Trazenfeld of Warren R. Trazenfeld, P.A., Miami, for appellants/cross-appellees.

Gina E. Caruso of Hinshaw & Culbertson, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellees/Cross-Appellants-James D. Robinson and Spence, Payne, Masington & Needle, P.A.

John H. Pelzer and John R. Keller of Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee-Scott Jay.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellant's motion for rehearing, withdraw our prior opinion, and substitute the following in its place.

Appellants, George Kates and Nehama Kates (the Kates) filed a Complaint against James D. Robinson (Robinson), and Spence, Payne, Masington & Needle, P.A. (Spence, Payne), and another attorney who was subsequently dismissed from the action and is not a party to this appeal, alleging legal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases