1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 286 A.D.2d
  5. 286 A.D.2d 553 (2001)
 

MATTER OF WERNER v. CASTIGLIONE

286 A.D.2d 553 (2001)

729 N.Y.S.2d 227

In the Matter of DIETRICH WERNER, Respondent, v. HARRY M. CASTIGLIONE et al., as Commissioners of the Ulster County Board of Elections, Respondents, and MARK J. BRANDHOFER, Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of TERENCE CARLE, Respondent, v. HARRY M. CASTIGLIONE et al., as Commissioners of the Ulster County Board of Elections, Respondents, and DOMINICK VANACORE, Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

Decided August 23, 2001.

Per Curiam.

Initially, we have considered and reject the necessary party argument. Turning to the merits, the opportunity to ballot petitions in these proceedings contain the appropriate form for the appointment of a Committee to Receive Notices, but the space for the names and addresses of the appointees in each petition is blank. Prior to the Election Reform Act of 1992 (L 1992, ch 79), the absence of a Committee to Receive Notices was a fatal defect (see, Matter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases