Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's claim of excessive preindictment delay is unpreserved for appellate review since it was not raised in a timely pretrial motion to dismiss the indictment (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; 210.20 [1] [f]; [2], [3]; 30.10; People v Ramirez,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.