CURRIE STATE BANK v. SCHMITZ

No. C3-00-2152.

628 N.W.2d 205 (2001)

CURRIE STATE BANK, Respondent, v. Douglas SCHMITZ, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 26, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Renee C. Rubish, Charles W. Ries, Maschka, Riedy & Ries, Mankato, for respondent.

William J. Wetering, Hedeen, Hughes, Wetering, & Kness, Worthington, for appellant.

Considered and decided by SCHUMACHER, P.J., ANDERSON and FOLEY, JJ.


OPINION

DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge*

Appellant challenges the district court's entry of summary judgment in favor of respondent, arguing that a genuine issue of material fact existed regarding whether appellant's lack of knowledge that respondent had granted extensions of time for payment of two promissory notes, co-signed by appellant, relieved appellant from liability. Appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases