The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
Donte Osbon SMITH et al., Defendants and Appellants.
Supreme Court of California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 11, 2001.
January 11, 2001.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Matthew D. Alger, under appointment by the Supreme Court, Fresno, for Defendant and Appellant Donte Osbon Smith.
Peter A. Leeming, under appointment by the Supreme Court, Santa Cruz, for Defendant and Appellant Jack Loney.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, David P. Druliner, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Carol Wendelin Pollack, Assistant Attorney General, Linda C. Johnson, Suzann E. Papagoda, Kyle S. Brodie and Kent J. Bullard, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Supreme Court of California.
BROWN, J.
Under subdivision (b) of Penal Code section 1202.4,1 a trial court must impose "a separate and additional restitution fine" as part of the judgment of conviction entered against a criminal defendant, "unless it finds compelling and extraordinary reasons for not doing so, and states those reasons on the record." If the "sentence includes a period of parole," then the court must also impose a parole revocation fine...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
