LEE v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

No. B143859.

106 Cal.Rptr.2d 726 (2001)

88 Cal.App.4th 1187

Warren LEE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

May 8, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gilchrist & Rutter and Peter M. Hebert, Santa Monica, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


CURRY, J.

This appeal is from an order awarding attorney fees and costs to respondent Warren Lee. Lee's original request for fees and costs was denied by the trial court as untimely. Almost six months after the court's order was entered, Lee sought relief under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereafter section 473), which was granted. Appellant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (hereafter Wells Fargo) contends that the request for relief was itself untimely. Well...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases