DiVIGENZE v. CHRYSLER CORP.


785 A.2d 37 (2001)

345 N.J.Super 314

Nancy DiVIGENZE and Michael DiVigenze, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 21, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin M. McKeon argued the cause for appellant, (Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, attorneys; Mr. McKeon, on the brief).

Thomas F. Klosinski argued the cause for respondents, (Power & Associates, attorneys; Michael Power, on the brief).

John J. Farmer, Jr., Attorney General, attorneys for amicus curiae New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs, (Andrea M. Silkowitz, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Susan Carboni, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).1

Before Judges SKILLMAN, WECKER and LESEMANN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by WECKER, J.A.D.

After a jury verdict for plaintiffs, the trial judge announced that judgment would be entered against defendant, Chrysler Corporation, for the adjusted lease price of a 1997 Jeep Cherokee under the New Jersey Automobile Lemon Law, N.J.S.A. 56:12-29 to -49 (the Lemon Law). The judge denied defendant's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

Defendant's appeal raises...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases