1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 111 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 111 Cal.Rptr.2d 711 (2001)
 

LOVEJOY v. AT&T CORP.

No. C034423.

111 Cal.Rptr.2d 711 (2001)

92 Cal.App.4th 85

Robert LOVEJOY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. AT&T CORPORATION, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing October 5, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Mark C. Barulich and Mark C. Barulich, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Watson, Khachadourian Re & lams, Sacramento, and Kevin R. Iams for Defendant and Appellant.

CALLAHAN, J.

One of the fastest growing subjects of consumer complaints is the practice of "slamming," wherein one telephone carrier company surreptitiously gains control over the service provided by another without notice to the customer.1 Slamming is prohibited by the law of this state. (Pub.Util. Code, § 2889.5.)

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases