Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff was entitled to a deficiency judgment (see, RPAPL 1371). The equitable considerations raised by the appellants do not warrant a modification of the deficiency judgment (see, Trustco Bank, Natl. Assn. v Sack,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.