1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 113 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 113 Cal.Rptr.2d 700 (2001)
 

LUSHBAUGH v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.

No. B143326.

113 Cal.Rptr.2d 700 (2001)

93 Cal.App.4th 1159

Jeffrey Peter LUSHBAUGH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

November 20, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gronemeier & Associates and Dale L. Gronemeier, South Pasadena, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Katten Muchin Zavis, Thomas J. Leanse, Stacey McKee Knight and Karen L. Stephenson, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Respondents.

CURRY, J.

The parties in this case seek to have us resolve the issue of whether a stand alone warehouse-type retail establishment is the modern-day equivalent of a shopping mall and therefore subject to the California Supreme Court's decision in Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center (1979) 23 Cal.3d 899, 153 Cal.Rptr. 854, ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases