DALEURE v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY

Nos. 00-5423, 00-5538, 00-5541, 00-5440, 00-5539, 00-5536, 00-5540.

269 F.3d 540 (2001)

Gus "Skip" DALEURE, Jr.; Christine Leake; Belinda Morrison; Paul Dixon Kubala; Tina Owen; Jesse Carl Emert, Sr.; James B. Adams, Jr.; Gail E. Anderson, and the Proposed Plaintiff Class, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Jefferson County Fiscal Court; MCI Telecommunications Corporation; Worldcom Technologies, Inc.; Grayson County Fiscal Court; Bullitt County Fiscal Court; Larue Fiscal Court; Fiscal Court of Franklin County, Kentucky; Oldham County Fiscal Court; Invision Telecom, Inc.; Gateway Technologies, Inc.; Security Telecom Corporation, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: October 17, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: F. Thomas Conway (briefed), White, Conway & Adams, Bart Adams (briefed), Michael B. Roney (argued), Bart Adams & Associates, Louisville, Kentucky, for Plaintiffs. C. Kent Hatfield, Middleton Reutlinger, Louisville, Kentucky, Stephanie A. Joyce, Patton Boggs LLP, Washington, D.C., for Defendants.

ON BRIEF: F. Thomas Conway, WHITE, CONWAY & ADAMS, Louisville, Kentucky, Bart Adams, Louisville, Kentucky, for Plaintiffs. C. Kent Hatfield, Henry S. Alford, Middleton Reutlinger, Louisville, Kentucky, Stephanie A. Joyce, Patton Boggs LLP, Washington, D.C., Glenn B. Manishin, PATTON BOGGS LLP, McLean, Virginia, Gary E. Smith, GRAHAM, BRIGHT & SMITH, Dallas, Texas, Michael R. Morow, STEPHENSON, DALY, MOROW & KURNIK, Indianapolis, Indiana, Sean E. Holguin, OFFICE OF THE PIMA COUNTY ATTORNEY, Tucson, Arizona, Denise Garrison McElvein, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, St. Louis, Missouri, Erwin O. Switzer III, St. Louis, Missouri, David Whalin, Robert T. Watson, LANDRUM & SHOUSE, Louisville, Kentucky, Suzanne D. Cordery, ASSISTANT JEFFERSON COUNTY ATTORNEY, Louisville, Kentucky, Richard D. Porotsky, Jr., DINSMORE & SHOHL, Cincinnati, Ohio, John E. Selent, DINSMORE & SHOHL, Louisville, Kentucky, William H. Hollander, Michelle D. Wyrick, WYATT, TARRANT & COMBS, Louisville, Kentucky, for Defendants.

Mary R. Harville, Trevor L. Earl, Reed, Weitkamp, Schell & Vice, Louisville, KY, Denise Garrison McElvein (briefed), Erwin O. Switzer, III (briefed), Office of the Attorney General, St Louis, MO, David Whalin (briefed), Melanie L. Straw-Boone, Robert T. Watson (briefed), Landrum & Shouse, Louisville, KY, Suzanne D. Cordery (briefed), Assistant Jefferson County Attorney, C. Kent Hatfield (argued and briefed), Henry S. Alford (briefed), Middleton Reutlinger, Louisville, KY, Thomas F. O'Neill, III, MCI Telecommunications Corp., Washington, DC, Richard D. Porotsky, Jr. (briefed), Dinsmore & Shohl, Cincinnati, OH, Matthew W. Breetz, Stites & Harbison, John E. Selent (briefed), Barbara M. Albert, Dinsmore & Shohl, William H. Hollander (briefed), Michelle D. Wyrick (briefed), Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs, Louisville, KY, Stephanie A. Joyce (argued and briefed), Patton Boggs LLP, Washington, DC, Glenn B. Manishin (briefed), Patton Boggs LLP, McLean, VA, Gary E. Smith (briefed), Graham, Bright & Smith, Dallas, TX, Michael R. Morow (briefed), Stephenson, Daly, Morow & Kurnik, Indianapolis, IN, Barbara Lawall, Pima County Attorney, Sean E. Holguin (briefed), Jeane Holguin (briefed), Office of the Pima County Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Defendants.

Before: KEITH, KENNEDY, and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.


Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206

OPINION

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs, a class of relatives of prisoners incarcerated in Kentucky correctional facilities, sued the Commonwealth of Kentucky, the Kentucky Department of Corrections, the state of Missouri, several Kentucky, Missouri, Arizona, and Indiana municipal entities, and various private telephone providers alleging antitrust violations and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases