Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the trial court erred in permitting the prosecutor to elicit purportedly irrelevant and prejudicial testimony from an undercover officer. The undercover officer testified about a conversation he had with the defendant approximately one month before the defendant's arrest, in which the defendant allegedly offered to sell him a .380 semi-automatic handgun during a drug sale. The alleged error is not...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
