1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 106 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 106 Cal.Rptr.2d 702 (2001)
 

CHAMBERS v. KAY

No. A091362.

106 Cal.Rptr.2d 702 (2001)

88 Cal.App.4th 903

Arthur CHAMBERS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Philip KAY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

As Modified May 24, 2001.

Review Granted July 11, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Werchick & Werchick, Arne Werchick, Truckee, Bornstein & Bornstein Jonathan H. Bornstein, San Francisco, Law Offices of Joel D. Adler, Joel Adler, San Francisco, for plaintiff and appellant.

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, Steven D. Wasserman, Thomas F. Kopshever, San Francisco, Law Offices of Philip Edward Kay, Philip Edward Kay, San Francisco, Lawrence Anthony Organ, for defendant and respondent.

SWAGER, J.

The issues now before us arise from a dispute between two attorneys over fees generated from the successful prosecution of a case previously before us. (See Weeks v. Baker & McKenzie (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1128, 74 Cal.Rptr.2d 510.) The trial court entered judgment against appellant in his action for breach of an agreement with respondent for division of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases