DAVIS v. MAUTE

No. 307, 2000.

770 A.2d 36 (2001)

Rosetta DAVIS, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. Franz MAUTE, Defendant Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: March 30, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bartholomew J. Dalton (argued), and Laura J. Kominkiewicz, of Dalton & Associates, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware, for Appellant.

David L. Baumberger, of Chrissinger & Baumberger, Wilmington, Delaware, for Appellee.

Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and STEELE, Justices.


VEASEY, Chief Justice.

This personal injury case requires us to address the question of the limitations on defense counsel's argument and the admissibility of photographs of a vehicle, both of which are impliedly advanced, without expert testimony, to minimize personal injury damages because damage to the vehicle was minor. In his opening statement and in summation, counsel for the defendant suggested that the plaintiff's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases