Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the lengthy delay between his indictment and his return to New York from Virginia violated his right to a speedy trial. We disagree.
The relevant factors to be assessed in determining whether the defendant was deprived of a speedy trial are (1) the extent of the delay, (2) the reasons for the delay, (3) the nature of the underlying charge, (4) whether there is any indication that the
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.