U.S. v. SANDOVAL

No. 99-4223.

241 F.3d 549 (2001)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcelo Sandoval, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided February 20, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen A. Kubiatowski (argued), Office of the U.S. Atty., Springfield, MO, Donald B. Allegro, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Rock Island, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert L. Rascia, Peter J. Faraci (argued), Serpico, Novelle & Navigato, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before FLAUM, Chief Judge, and EVANS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge.

A fresh question raised in this case is whether the classification of a firearm as a "semiautomatic assault weapon" under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(B)(i), is a sentencing factor or an element of the offense (of using and carrying a firearm in connection with a crime of violence or drug trafficking). If it's an element, it must be submitted to a jury and proven beyond a reasonable doubt. We hold that it is a sentencing factor.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases