1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 104 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 104 Cal.Rptr.2d 683 (2001)
 

FERREIRA v. GRAY, CARY, WARE & FREIENDRICH

No. D034678.

104 Cal.Rptr.2d 683 (2001)

87 Cal.App.4th 409

Frank E. FERREIRA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. GRAY, CARY, WARE & FREIDENRICH et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

Review Denied June 13, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sparber, Ferguson, Ponder & Ryan, Richard J. Annen and Jill D. Perry, San Diego, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Post, Kirby, Noonan & Sweat, David J. Noonan, San Diego, and Thomas W. Betties, for Defendants and Respondents.

McINTYRE, J.

In this appeal, we decide that where a case is concluded by a settlement after trial, there is no favorable termination for purposes of pursuing a malicious prosecution action.

Frank E. Ferreira sued the law firm of Gray, Cary, Ware & Freidenrich, and two of its attorneys, Duane S. Horning and L.B. Chip Edleson (together Gray, Cary) for malicious prosecution, based on their representation of Debra, Maryanne and Christine Rushing in an earlier...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases