1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 627 N.W.2d
  5. 627 N.W.2d 159 (2001)
 

SOLLIN v. WANGLER

No. 20000284.

627 N.W.2d 159 (2001)

2001 ND 96

Richard SOLLIN and Linda Sollin, Plaintiffs and Appellants v. Dale WANGLER and Pius Wangler, Defendants and Appellees.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

May 22, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas J. Nill (argued), Douglas J. Nill Law Office, Minneapolis, MN, for plaintiffs and appellants.

Lee J. Balerud (appeared), Minot, for plaintiffs and appellants.

Jerry W. Evenson, Zuger Kirmis & Smith, Bismarck, for defendants and appellees.

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Richard and Linda Sollin appealed from an order denying a motion for new trial in their personal injury action against Dale and Pius Wangler. We conclude the trial court's failure to inform the jury, sua sponte, about the effect of its answers to comparative fault questions on its award of damages is not fundamental error requiring a new trial, and the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial. We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases