John D. PUCHNER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Anne C. HEPPERLA, Defendant-Respondent.
John D. PUCHNER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Bruce C. O'NEILL, Anne Hepperla and Jacqueline Hepperla, Defendants-Respondents.
Anne C. HEPPERLA, Petitioner-Respondent,
v.
John D. PUCHNER, Respondent-Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted on briefs November 22, 2000.
Decided January 31, 2001.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant and respondent-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of John Puchner, pro se.
On behalf of the defendants-respondents and petitioner-respondent, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Bruce C. O'Neill and Diane Slomowitz of Fox, O'Neill & Shannon, S.C. of Milwaukee.
Before Nettesheim, Anderson and Snyder, JJ.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
¶ 1. PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated appeals,1 we hold that John D. Puchner's appeals are frivolous2 and remand to the circuit court under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.25(3)(a) for a determination of the costs, fees and reasonable attorney's fees to be awarded to the respondents, Anne Hepperla, Bruce C. O'Neill and Jacqueline Hepperla. We also bar Puchner from commencing future proceedings in this court and the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.