1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 52 S.W.3d
  5. 52 S.W.3d 733 (2001)
 

BRENTS v. HAYNES & BOONE

No. 00-0278.

52 S.W.3d 733 (2001)

Thomas E. BRENTS and Doris H. Brents, Petitioners, v. HAYNES & BOONE, William Ratliff, III, and G. Dennis Sheehan, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Texas.

April 26, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Jackson Carroll, Dallas, for Petitioners.

Nina Cortell, Haynes & Boone, Dallas, Craig M. Price, Haynes & Boone, Fort Worth, Charles G. Orr, LaDawn H. Conway, Haynes & Boone, Dallas, Richard L. Bourland, Bourland Kirkman Seidler & Evans, Fort Worth, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The issue in this legal-malpractice case is whether the rule we announced in Hughes v. Mahaney & Higgins, 821 S.W.2d 154 (Tex.1991), tolled the statute of limitations on the plaintiffs' claims. The court of appeals held that it did not, and affirmed a summary judgment for the defendant on limitations grounds. 10 S.W.3d 772.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases