PROCTER & GAMBLE CO. v. AMWAY CORP.

No. 99-20590.

242 F.3d 539 (2001)

The PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY and The Procter & Gamble Distributing Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMWAY CORPORATION, et al., Defendants, Amway Corporation; The Amway Distributors Association Council; Ja-Ri Corporation; Donald R. Wilson; Wow International, Inc.; Wilson Enterprises, Inc.; Ronald A. Rummel, Individually Doing Business as Rummel Enterprises; Kevin Shinn; Randy Haugen; Freedom Associates, Inc.; Freedom Tools, Inc.; Randy Walker; Walker International Network; Gene Shaw; John & Jane Does 6-10, Business Entities; Dexter Yager, Sr.; Birdie Yager; and D&B Yager Enterprises, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

February 14, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur R. Miller (argued), Cambridge, MA, Stanley M. Chesley, Fay E. Stilz, Paul Michael DeMarco, Waite, Schneider, Bayless & Chesley, Cincinnati, OH, Richard A. Sheehy, Sheehy, Serpe & Ware, Houston, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Charles L. Babcock (argued), David T. Moran, Carl C. Butzer, Jackson & Walker, Dallas, TX, Richard Earl Griffin, Jackson & Walker, Houston, TX, for Amway Corp.

William J. Abraham, Rick Joseph Abraham, Abraham Law Offices, Columbus, OH, Edward B. McDonough, Jr., Mark Stephen Dube, McDonough & Associates, Houston, TX, for Amway Distributors Ass'n Council.

Robert L. DeJong, Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, Grand Rapids, MI, for Ja-Ri Corp.

Byron George Lee, Kim G. Altsuler, Allison Linneman Strawn, Coats, Rose, Yale, Holm, Ryman & Lee, Houston, TX, for Donald R. Wilson, Wow Intern., Inc., Wilson Enterprises, Inc., Ronald A. Rummel, Randy Haugen, Freedom Associates, Inc., Freedom Tools, Inc., Randy Walker, Walker Intern. Network, Dexter Yager, Sr., Birdie Yager and D&B Yager Enterprises, Inc.

Warren Royal Taylor, Taylor & Taylor, Houston, TX, for Kevin Shinn and Gene Shaw.

Before SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges, and ROETTGER, District Judge.


JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

The Procter & Gamble Company ("P&G") appeals the dismissal of its lawsuit against Amway Corporation and other defendants for defamation, fraud, and violations of the Lanham Act, RICO, and Texas state law. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

I.

P&G, a manufacturer and distributor of numerous household products, has been plagued by rumors of links to Satanism...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases